Nonprofit procurement

Buying under federal award rules, where the method is dictated by the amount.

Nonprofit procurement in SigmaPointPi
/verticals/nonprofit/procurement

An organisation spending federal money buys under the uniform guidance procurement standards. The method permitted depends on the dollar amount, and using the wrong one is a finding.

Micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bid, competitive proposal and noncompetitive each have their own thresholds and their own documentation.

Where everything sits

This view hit a snag
This view hit a snag
What went wrong
What went wrong

How to work this page

Know your thresholds

They are set in regulation and adjust over time. The applicable ones are recorded rather than remembered.

Document competition at the right level

A small purchase needs price quotes from an adequate number of sources. Adequate means documented, not felt.

Justify any noncompetitive purchase

Sole source has specific permitted grounds. The justification is written before the purchase, not after a question about it.

Check suspension and debarment

Federal funds cannot go to an excluded party. The check is required and its result is recorded.

On a phone

Nonprofit procurement on iPhone 15 Pro Max

Every figure from the desktop appears here, stacked rather than reduced. Tables scroll inside themselves so the page never moves sideways, and figures keep their separators and their alignment at every width.

Questions people actually ask

Does this apply to all our spending?

To spending charged to federal awards. Many organisations apply the same standards throughout because running two systems produces mistakes.

What is the most common finding?

Inadequate documentation of competition. The competition usually happened and nobody wrote it down.