Government grants

Awards received and awards made, each with conditions running in both directions.

Government grants in SigmaPointPi
/verticals/government/grants

A government entity is usually both a recipient and a passthrough. Money received carries conditions from the awarding agency, and money passed to subrecipients carries your own monitoring obligations.

Subrecipient monitoring is where entities most often fail an audit, because the obligation continues after the money has left.

Where everything sits

Grant Management
Grant Management
Total Awarded
Total Awarded
Total Drawn
Total Drawn
Remaining Available
Remaining Available
Active Grants
Active Grants
Grant Utilization
Grant Utilization

How to work this page

Separate recipient from passthrough

Different obligations. As a passthrough you owe monitoring, risk assessment and audit follow-up.

Assess subrecipient risk before awarding

Prior performance, experience and audit history. The assessment determines how closely you monitor and it has to exist.

Track the single audit threshold

Subrecipients spending above the federal threshold need a single audit, and you must obtain and review it.

Follow up on findings

A finding in a subrecipient audit requires documented follow-up from you. Receiving the report is not the obligation.

On a phone

Government grants on iPhone 15 Pro Max

Every figure from the desktop appears here, stacked rather than reduced. Tables scroll inside themselves so the page never moves sideways, and figures keep their separators and their alignment at every width.

Questions people actually ask

Subrecipient or contractor?

A subrecipient carries out part of the program. A contractor provides goods or services in a competitive market. The distinction determines whether monitoring applies and it is a documented determination.

What is the most common finding?

Inadequate subrecipient monitoring. The money is passed correctly and nobody watches what happens next.